<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Software Developer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cwsof.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cwsof.com/blog</link>
	<description>Great programmers don&#039;t just happen !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:23:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Classic Visual Basic&#8217;s end marked a key change in software development. by Chris Boss</title>
		<link>http://cwsof.com/blog/?p=608#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Boss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwsof.com/blog/?p=608#comment-1221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article may end up on Codeproject, so I didn&#039;t want to go into much detail about PowerBasic in it. But for those who read it here on my web site, my experience with PowerBasic has taught me a great deal about how Windows works under the hood and how one can tap into the power of the Windows API. Please do not read into this article the idea that I somehow view PowerBasic flawed or somehow inferior to Visual Basic. The few areas which it does lack (in the GUI area) I have easily overcoming by writing my own GUI libraries and tapping into the Windows API. But Visual Basic could have learned quite a bit from PowerBasic and there are many Visual Basic programmers, who while not quite ready to tackle a language like PowerBasic, would really desire some form of Visual Basic be brought back. IMO, the combination of a new Visual Basic (classis style) along with PowerBasic would be an amazing combination. If you never heard of PowerBasic, please visit their web site at:  http://powerbasic.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article may end up on Codeproject, so I didn&#8217;t want to go into much detail about PowerBasic in it. But for those who read it here on my web site, my experience with PowerBasic has taught me a great deal about how Windows works under the hood and how one can tap into the power of the Windows API. Please do not read into this article the idea that I somehow view PowerBasic flawed or somehow inferior to Visual Basic. The few areas which it does lack (in the GUI area) I have easily overcoming by writing my own GUI libraries and tapping into the Windows API. But Visual Basic could have learned quite a bit from PowerBasic and there are many Visual Basic programmers, who while not quite ready to tackle a language like PowerBasic, would really desire some form of Visual Basic be brought back. IMO, the combination of a new Visual Basic (classis style) along with PowerBasic would be an amazing combination. If you never heard of PowerBasic, please visit their web site at:  <a href="http://powerbasic.com" rel="nofollow">http://powerbasic.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 Tablets &#8211; Where are they ? by Joe Welsh</title>
		<link>http://cwsof.com/blog/?p=313#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwsof.com/blog/?p=313#comment-798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t see the models from 2go PC listed.  Here is the latest model:

http://www.2gopc.com/2gopc-products/2go-convertible-classmate-pc-nl3-netbook/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t see the models from 2go PC listed.  Here is the latest model:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.2gopc.com/2gopc-products/2go-convertible-classmate-pc-nl3-netbook/" rel="nofollow">http://www.2gopc.com/2gopc-products/2go-convertible-classmate-pc-nl3-netbook/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 Tablets &#8211; Where are they ? by MIchael Mattias</title>
		<link>http://cwsof.com/blog/?p=313#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>MIchael Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwsof.com/blog/?p=313#comment-504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Each article could use a &quot;link&quot;  back to the &quot;blog home page&quot; 

MCM]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each article could use a &#8220;link&#8221;  back to the &#8220;blog home page&#8221; </p>
<p>MCM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 8 Preview &#8211; Part 1 by Chris Boss</title>
		<link>http://cwsof.com/blog/?p=289#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Boss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwsof.com/blog/?p=289#comment-272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have assumed that Windows 8 would have some decent video drivers for at least common video chip sets. The question is though, is how do you get video drivers for Windows 8 ? Can you use WIndows 7 drivers ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have assumed that Windows 8 would have some decent video drivers for at least common video chip sets. The question is though, is how do you get video drivers for Windows 8 ? Can you use WIndows 7 drivers ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 8 Preview &#8211; Part 1 by Tim</title>
		<link>http://cwsof.com/blog/?p=289#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cwsof.com/blog/?p=289#comment-271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you don&#039;t have the right video driver, you&#039;re video performance is going to suffer in every area. Switch Vista to use a generic (non-accelerated) video driver and run your tests again. Screen updates will suck HARD. Your complaints about video performance in Windows 8 while using a generic driver are worthless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t have the right video driver, you&#8217;re video performance is going to suffer in every area. Switch Vista to use a generic (non-accelerated) video driver and run your tests again. Screen updates will suck HARD. Your complaints about video performance in Windows 8 while using a generic driver are worthless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
